Assessing the strategic alliance between Industrial and Commercial Bank of China and Standard Bank

Vanessa Eidt

Abstract


Many financial experts, scholars and politicians around the world took notice in 2007,
when the Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (ICBC), the world largest bank by
market capitalization, announced that it would invest US$5.6 billion to acquire a 20%
stake in the South African Standard Bank (SBSA). After all, SBSA is Africa‟s top bank by
assets with a continent-wide footprint. At the same time, the announcement of the deal
set off an avalanche of assumptions that this deal “fits nicely” into China‟s “go global”
strategy and was therefore mainly initiated by the Chinese government. Moreover, it was
assumed that the alliance underpins a new shift of China‟s engagement from a
resource-seeking strategy to a more knowledge-seeking and strategic-asset-seeking
strategy in Africa, and that more Chinese banks would follow ICBC‟s example, thereby
considerably impacting Sino-African relationships in the long run.
Four years after the announcement of the deal, this study intends to evaluate these
before-mentioned assumptions. Therefore, it investigates the general reasons and
motivations for Chinese banks to enter to the South African banking sector. Within this
context, the strategic alliance between ICBC and SBSA is used as a case study, which
is studied against the above mentioned broader context to gain a better understanding
for the Chinese engagement in the South African banking sector and its importance for
the Sino–African relationship in the long run.
The research is based on the analysis of public documents, reports and theoretical
papers as well as valuable insights from 13 interviews, which were conducted during
August and September 2011 in Cape Town, Johannesburg and Pretoria with key
representatives from the South African and Chinese banking industry, the South African
financial sector regulatory body, the South African government, scholars, financial
experts as well as the private sector.2 The interviews were mainly conducted as semistructured,
mostly (11 out of 13) face-to-face interviews and some (2 out of 13) via
telephone.

Full Text:

PDF


DOI: https://doi.org/10.7552/69-0-93

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.



ISSN 2308-8699 (online)       Creative Commons License - CC BY 4.0

Powered by OJS and hosted by Stellenbosch University Library and Information Service since 2013.


Disclaimer:

This journal is hosted by the SU LIS on request of the journal owner/editor. The SU LIS takes no responsibility for the content published within this journal, and disclaim all liability arising out of the use of or inability to use the information contained herein. We assume no responsibility, and shall not be liable for any breaches of agreement with other publishers/hosts.

SUNJournals Help